A Recent Conversation
Mina: So how is the new work-in-progress going?
Me: Really well! I mean, I got up to chapter 18 and I was flowing and everything. Wrote a couple thousand words last month, but then... (sigh)
Mina: ...?
Me: Well, I was writing, and everything was going fine, but then my young, energetic, American female character strong-armed a young man to the ground. I don't know how it happened! One minute she was being very nice and chatty, the next, strong-arming him to the ground! That would have never happened in 1887 Victorian London!
Mina: (laughs)
Me: So I'm hitting the books again. I need to give her something else to do, something that will cause a scandal but still interest the English aristocracy, not scare them away. (I shake my head.) Strong-arming a guy to the ground. Who does that?
It's one thing to be unique, but to be so modern! I'm appalled. But thanks to my character, I'm learning a lot about how the 1870s Anglomania (specifically in New York, Boston, Washington DC, Ohio, etc) started. Despite the fact that the English aristocracy most staunchly supported the Confederacy during the American Civil War, a mere ten years earlier.
How many of you have had a character that broke out of his or her time period so completely? What have you done to rein them in? Or have you changed your story/time period to fit the character?
Book: Stardust
Title: Stardust
Author: Neil Gaiman
Genre: Fantasy
Length: 235 pgs
Summary: In the town of Wall there is a young man named Tristran Thorn, and he is in love with a young woman named Victoria Forester. Victoria, young, beautiful, and completely aware of the fact, sends Tristran on a fool's errand: to fetch the fallen star on the horizon. And so, Tristran steps across the border from the everyday to the mystical.
pg 23 - He entertained these thoughts awkwardly, as a man entertains unexpected guests. Then, as he reached his objective, he pushed these thoughts away, as a man apologizes to his guests, and leaves them, muttering something abuot a prior engagement.
pg 36 - "Anyway," said Cecilia Hempstock, Louisa's cousin, "he has already been married. I would not wish to marry someone who has already been married. It would be," she opined, "like having someone else break in one's own pony."
"Personally, I would imagine that to be the sole advantage of marrying a widdower," said Amelia Robinson. "That someone else would have removed the rough edges; broken him in, if you will. Also, I would imagine that by that age his lusts would long since have been sated, and abated, which would free one from a number of indignities."
pg 131 - "A nymph. I was a wood-nymph. But I got pursued by a prince, not a nice prince, the other kind, and, well, you'd think a prince, even the wrong kind, would understand about boundaries, wouldn't you?"
"You would?"
"Exactly what I think. But he didn't, so I did a bit of invoking while I was running, and--ba-boom!--tree. What do you think?"
"Well," said Tristran. "I do not know what you were like as a wood-nymph, madam, but you are a magnificent tree.
"I was pretty cute as a nymph, too."
pg 224 - He wondered how it could have taken him so long to realize how much he cared for her, and he told her so, and she called him an idiot, and he decalred that it was the finest thing that ever a man had been called.
Why should you read this book?
Because it's Neil Gaiman, and everyone should read one Gaiman book at some point. This book begged to be read aloud, and I almost wish (now this is a shocker) that I had the audio version. The narration is simple yet intriguing and complex; I want to read it again just to figure out how he was able to convey so much with so little. Which is exactly why you should read this book. Long sentences and over-the-top vocabulary are gimicks easily pointed out...they hide bad plots and expose worse execution. Gaiman's simple narration is a quick read, yet, there are important themes discussed.
Plus, the movie comes out on my birthday. So, read the book before you watch the movie, as the movie is almost never as good as the original.
Hurting Our Characters
Well, it's Finals Week™, so we all know what that means: I get to start writing again! At the end of every quarter as assignments trickle to a halt and I'm left with more free time, all those little nuggets of inspiration that came to me earlier (but I couldn't encourage because I had to be in school-mode) are now free to take over. What does this mean, Worderella? What are you trying to tell us?
It means that I've written another couple of thousand words over the last few days, which is a cause for celebration. Assuming I keep my overall goal of approximately 85 000 words (the range for a full-length novel is anywhere from 80 000 to 100 000+), then I can safely say I am 39.5% complete with this draft.
But I've hit a slight roadblock. Attempting to be a diligent creator of characters and plot, I have just re-introduced a man from my main character's past who hurt her, and is about to do it again. For the first time in my writing life, I don't want to hurt my main character anymore. I kind of feel like she's gone through a lot as is, and I like her. Why would I continue to want to hurt her?
Well, because that's what you're supposed to do in order to make the character grow and change. And because if you didn't throw everything and the bath tub at her, your story is going to be boring and you'll get tired of writing it. And because it will help you, as a writer, and perhaps even a person, to learn that conflict is a necessary evil.
This is often a topic of discussion between
The fact of the matter is that I have to hurt my main character. I have to hurt all my characters, in some form or another, but most especially the main one. I have to bring her so low that she feels like she can't go on, that there is nothing she can do to improve her situation...and then, because she is at the very bottom, have her realize that she can only go up from there. It's the only way. I'm sure I'll get past this, and will eventually shatter her (but oh! she's already fragmented to begin with!).
Have you ever been in this situation where you feel like you have to do something awful to your character, but you can't bring yourself to do it? What do you do about it? How does one get past this?
Book: The Thirteenth Tale
Title: The Thirteenth Tale
Author: Diane Setterfield
Genre: Fiction
Length: 406 pgs
Summary: Margaret Lea has a secret about her birth; a secret that haunts her to this day, and affects every decision she makes. She is the daughter of an antique book dealer, and so is his helpmate in running the bookshop that maintains their lifestyle. One day, a letter arrives for Margaret, written in an awful hand, requesting that she journey to the home of the infamous writer, Vida Winter. Miss Winter is infamous because of her past, or lack of it, for with every interview there is a new rendition, and none of them are true. There is no record of Miss Winter's birth, her childhood...nothing to say who she was before she appeared in the literary world. Miss Winter, it seems, wants to tell the truth of her past for the first time, ever, and she has chosen Margaret for the job. After thirty (or forty, perhaps?) years of public speculation about the past of Miss Vida Winter, and the plot of the missing thirteenth tale from her book Thirteen Tales of Change and Desperation (only twelve were released), Vida Winter is ready to speak the truth.
pg 4 - (I never read without making sure I am in a secure position. I have been like this ever since the age of seven when, sitting on a high wall and reading The Water Babies, I was so seduced by the descriptions of underwater life that I unconsciously relaxed my muscles. Instead of being held buoyant by the water that so vividly surrounded me in my mind, I plummeted to the ground and knocked myself out. I can still feel the scar under my fringe now. Reading can be dangerous.)
pg 5 - Some writers don't like interviews of course. They get cross about it. "Same old questions," they complain. Well, what do they expect? Reporters are hacks. We writers are the real thing. Just because they always ask the same questions, it doesn't mean we have to give them the same answers, does it? I mean, making things up, it's what we do for a living.
pg 32 - I have always been a reader; I have read at every stage of my life, and there has never been a time when reading was not my greatest joy. And yet I cannot pretend that the reading I have done in my adult years matches in its impact on my soul the reading I did as a child. I still believe in stories. I still forget myself when I am in the middle of a good book. Yet it is not the same. Books are, for me, it must be said, the most important thing; what I cannot forget is that there was a time when they were at once more banal and essential than that. When I was a child, books were everything. And so there is in me, always, a yearning for the lost pleasure of books. [...] Miss Winter restored to me the virginal qualities of the novice reader, and then with her stories she ravished me.
pg 45 - People with ambition don't give a damn what other people think about them. I hardly suppose Wagner lost sleep worrying whether he'd hurt someone's feelings. But then he was a genius.
pg 46 - "Readers," continued Miss Winter, "are fools. They believe all writing is autobiographical. And so it is, but not in the way they think. The writer's life needs time to rot away before it can be used to nourish a work of fiction. It must be allowed to decay. [...] To write my books I needed my past left in peace, for time to do its work."
pg 100 - You could hear the power of his brain in his voice, which was quiet but quick, with a facility for finding the right words for the right person at the right time. You could see it in his eyes: dark brown and very shiny, like a bird's eyes, observant, intent, with strong, neat eyebrows above.
pg 177 - As he listened, he had been been rather struck by her queer little voice. Despite its distinctively feminine pitch it had more than a little masculine authority about it. She was articulate. She had an amusing habit of expressing views of her own with the same measured command as when she was explaining a theory by some authority she had read. And when she paused for breath at the end of a sentence, she would give him a quick look--he had found it disconcerting the first time, though he now found it rather droll--to let him know whether he was allowed to speak or whether she intended to go on speaking herself.
pg 220 - His voice had the unmistakable lightness of someone telling something extremely important. A story so cherished it had to be dressed in casualness to disguise its significance in case the listener turned out to be unsympathetic.
pg 289 - Do you know the feeling when you start reading a new book before the membrane of the last one has had time to close behind you? You leave the previous book with ideas and themes--characters even--caught in the fibers of your clothes, and when you open the new book, they are still with you.
Why should you read this book?
Because it is a love story to readers and writers. This just might be my favorite book if 2007, just as Elantris was my favorite of 2006. I will be hard-pressed, I think, to find another book that immediately enfolded me in its mystery and charm, leaving me dazed in my everyday activities as I contemplated the characters and plot. Every character is tangible and sympathetic, the setting is distinct, and the plot is original (to me, at least). The style is romantic in the classic sense of the word, yet entirely believable given the narrator's (Margaret) deep appreciation of books. We're never given a time period, yet I'm left with the impression that Margaret lives in the 1930s, 40s, or perhaps even 1950s.
Reading this book left me with sensations of DuMarier's Rebecca, Bronte's Wuthering Heights, LeFanu's The Wyvern Mystery, and other such romantic, gothic, books. Read it for the intense characterizations. Read it to know the language of a bibliophile speaking with another bibliophile, describing favorite works. I feel as though The Thirteenth Tale has changed me and so my writing: it's let me believe that there are readers willing to entertain a more romantic and classic style from a modern author, and that is good news indeed.
From the Notebook: Bringing Fiction to Life
I've been cleaning my place, trying to get things in order since I've moved back to campus, and I found some old notes about how to bring fiction to life.
I only got as far as character surface life in terms of my detailed handwritten notes, with a character that I gave up, sadly enough. There are a couple things I wanted to post from my notes, however, since they seem useful.
* Take cues from other actors (characters) to know how the main (or other) character should be treated.
* Want to build suspense? Here are twelve ways to do so:
- Objective - begins the reader anticipation, because now the character is working toward a goal.
- Raise Stakes - this increases the importance of the objective.
- Danger - increases the suspense because now lives might be at stake.
- Ticking Clock - having a time limit/deadline always raises stakes. What happens if the goal isn't reached by the time limit?
- Obstacles - the inability to take action can be very frustrating. This frustration ups the suspense as the reader sympathizes with the character.
- The Unknown - allows the reader to contemplate possibilities.
- Sexual Tension - having an attraction to someone always raises the suspense. Life is hard as it is, but throw in feelings, and the uncertainty that they are reciprocated, and we have a whole subplot in the works.
- Dramatic irony - this isn't necessarily suspenseful for the character, but for the readers who are privy to the new information.
- Living in the Future - the reader anticipates the difference between reality now, and what might happen in order for that reality to take place.
- Lack of Resolution - end your scenes and chapters with cliffhangers!
- Secret - "Secrets, secrets are no fun. Secrets, secrets hurt someone." Keeping secrets is a dangerous business. Keep them from the characters, not from your reader, unless you want your story to be vague and hard to understand. In other words, don't keep the secret from your reader if you want to be published.
- Character Type - through knowing the character, the reader anticipates what the character might and might not do. This wonder whether the character will do as expected increases the reader's suspsense.
Notes taken from The Plot Thickens: 8 Ways to Bring Fiction to Life by Noah Lukeman. St Martin's Press 2002, New York, New York.
Creating Convincing Characters
Happy Labor Day!
Today is a list from The Writer (July 2006) that quickly describes how to create convincing characters by Corey Blake. Blake begins the article, Creating believable characters takes time and discipline. Creating dynamically real individuals and not imposing your own thoughts and impressions on them is not easy to do, and is often the difference between a novel or screenplay that sits in a closet and one that finds its way into the hands of audiences.
- Label the desire essences of your main characters. Come up with lists of desires, fifty of them, and slowly condense them into twenty. Focus on the ones that feel right for each of your main characters, considering their religious beliefs, major life events, appearance, intelligence, siblings, education, parents, music, sex, etc, anything and everything a person in real life faces.
- Label the fear essences of your main characters. This is a little easier now that you've come up with the desire essences. The fear essences are the "polar opposites" of the desires. They battle the desires, and at each decision, either the desire or the fear will win. Make the pairs, and discard the pairs the character doesn't feel strongly about. Keep doing this until you have 10 pairs that excite you.
- Get specific in the backstory to understand how these essences came to be. As Blake says, "A character's current behavior is a battle between fear adn desire, and his or her immediate choices are made based on very specific (yet unconscious) experiences from the past--experiences that leave imprints." Write as much as you can about each half of each pair, so you have pages and pages on the character describing how they think or would think in a given situation because you know the history behind that certain essence.
- Describe their current behaviors. Take the essences and specific examples and determined the kinds of behavior your character has because of it.
- Raise the stakes. Don't be afraid to throw horrible obstacles at your characters! Watching them deal with obstacles is what makes a story interesting; no one wants to read about a girl who sails through life.
- Don't meddle. A "truthful story is going to grow from your willingness to let your characters make their own decisions based on how you defined them. As their parent, you have to let your children go."
- Let your characters play. At this point, your characters will be writing themselves.
Mr Beta Male
Being a historical romance author is interesting. It's taken me a while to admit it thanks to the now-expected snickers and leading questions, but yes, I am a romance author. But, my romance is of the traditional line, in terms of Jane Austen, Ann Rinaldi, Grace Livingston Hill, and Cheryl Zach (all of which are excellent writers). Thus, I'm finding that my reader demographic is the young adult female--anywhere from thirteen years old to eighteen, and those adult women who wish they could read more of the romances they used to when they were younger.
As such, I sometimes find it hard to read the popular historical romance that is out on the stands today. Take, for instance, the love interest. In your everyday historical romance, the hero is an Alpha Male. He takes charge, he's depressingly sexy, and he makes you jealous of the heroine because she gets to touch those perfectly scuplted pecs. Don't get me wrong, they certainly are fun to read. But my stories usually feature the Beta Male. What does that even mean, the Beta Male? Doesn't that mean he's a wimp? That's he's almost...too pretty to be a man? No, I don't think so. (I am, admittedly, a little biased.) Michele R. Bardsley says the following:
Who wants to read about those wimps? I do. So do you. Romantic comedies just don't work without him because his personality is more capable of handling crazy circumstances and outrageous events. The difference between a beta hero and an alpha hero in a romantic comedy is that the beta hero will laugh at himself and the situation; the alpha hero won't. In other words, the reader laughs with the beta hero and laughs at the alpha hero.
Beta heroes don't have cool-guy reputations, but they are sexy, funny and protective. No, they're not risk-takers with short tempers, and you won't find 'em romping around as Navy SEALs, undercover cops or bomb technicians. But a beta hero makes a great sudden daddy. Women think he's sweet, kids know he'll play catch or tea party, bosses know they can rely on him to get last-minute projects completed and men know they can trust him with their girlfriends.
The Beta Male is, in other words, the one we look to marry in real life (if marriage is what we're looking for). This isn't to say Mr Beta Male is perfect. He is a man, and human after all, so he should learn a couple things by the end of the story. In terms of traditional romance, Mr Beta Male just seems to fit better to me, and I'm horribly loyal to him. And that is what works for me. The important thing is that you, as a writer, realize just who you want to write about, and who you are writing for, and whether they are appropriate together.
I'll leave you with an amusing quiz Bardsley wrote about whether you know your Beta Male; it made me smile. To see Bardsley's workshop for creating the Beta Hero, click [here].
1. Beta heroes are:
A. Wimps.
B. Shy, silent and/or sweet.
C. Easygoing but not pushovers.
ANSWERS: A. 0 B. 1 C. 2
2. If a heroine starts crying, a beta hero will:
A. Immediately offer comfort.
B. Awkwardly offer to fix the problem.
C. Cry with her.
ANSWERS: A. 2 B. 1 C. 0
3. If the heroine asks, "What are you thinking?" The beta hero replies:
A. "Nothing."
B. "How beautiful you are."
C. "What kind of beer goes good with Cheetos."
ANSWERS: A. 2 B. 2 C. 2
(The beta hero is a guy, after all. Any of these are his potential answers.)
4. A beta hero''s home looks like:
A. The cover of House Beautiful.
B. The inside of a Hooters restaurant.
C. Dusty but tidy, with garage-sale furniture and a state-of-the-art entertainment center.
ANSWERS: A. 0 B. 1 C. 2
5. A beta hero handles emotional pain by:
A. Using physical activity to exhaust himself so he doesn''t have to think.
B. Using humor to deflect how he''s really feeling.
C. Discussing his feelings with his best friend or his dad.
ANSWERS: A. 1 B. 2 C. 0
Add your score:
10 points: Beta Babe!
9 to 7 points: Beta-rific.
6 to 4 points: For beta or worse.
3 to 0 points: Needs Beta 101.
Feb 2008 Update
The ECPI Editors at Redlines and Deadlines wrote a wonderful blog entry about Beta males that you should really check out.
Mina: So how is the new work-in-progress going?